|
|
No he hasn't been convicted. Whether he is found guilty or not is really irrelevant to the point that he advised her to not take her doctor recommended treatments. Sure a doctor can be wrong too. But they are still more qualified legally and in terms of education to be able to make such a suggestion.
Furthermore , as I understood the article, he told the woman that the cancer may be due to something going on with her teeth i think it said. And some other problem ta boot.Unless he is a dentist he cannot make a diagnosis of that nature. Not to mention, the dentists that examined her discovered this was not the case.
Specifically he advised she see him for cancer treatment, as opposed to her doctor. That too is a big nono.
Yes she had a choice, but she also might not have understood that he was not properly qualified to make those diagnoses. Desperation may have brought here to try alternative treatments. But he obviously presented himself as having qualifications he does not have legally.
|
