firekeeper said on
>- one view is that how you react to scanning a tumor is your thing - not the tumors or the person whom you are scanning (he\she may experience the tumor and its energy quite differently)
>
Okay, that's one view.
But my characterization of the energy of a cancerous tumor is consistent with results of pulling energy out of it. It's also consistent with the fact that infrared images show malignant tumors as running "hot." That doesn't necessarily mean the characterization is right, but it's at least suggestive. But if you have any other characterizations that suggest methods that get more effective results, then I'm open to them.
Cheers.
Bruce
