The Reiki Cafe Message Baord Main Navigation

Anything but Reiki

Board to talk about non-Reiki related topics
View Post# Switch Board
The Reiki Cafe Message Baord Main Navigation
ViewMessages Per Page

Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/4/2004 6:48 PM
ID# 78856
Chocolate Covered Cyanide—
the Little Ad That Thought It Could, and Did!

By Dale A. Beaulieu, M.S.

See George.

See George hug sad girl.

See George, our Nation’s Father.

See George run and win.

“He’s the most powerful person in the world; and all he wants is to keep me safe.”

“He’s the most powerful person in the world; and all he wants is to keep me safe.”


I saw the ad, heard the litany, and trembled at the sheer, unmitigated brilliance of its use. When I awakened at 3 a.m. the morning of 11-2, and heard W. would probably win, the phrase and the image of the ad take on haunting significance.

“He’s the most powerful person in the world; and all he wants is to keep me safe.”

The ad is sweetly lyrical—but also powerfully designed to meet us in our solar plexus. Like the horrid, booming roar and savage face of Theater Room of The Wizard of Oz, it unravels us from our collective core.

Blanketed within this depicted loving encounter is sheer fear. Fear that makes lions run from the room and hide. Fear that makes scarecrows long for even the ripping touch of flying monkeys. Fear that makes gentle-hearted Tin Men so distressed, that even without glands, they perspire.


The Magnificent, Powerful Monster of Oz within this ad hides around the edges of one maple-sweet presentation. To see, feel, know this monster, we must take the pieces of the ad apart and look with discernment. We must look at more than what is there, more than the content, but at that, too, which is implied and veiled as well. (“My opponent will not keep you safe.”

I know journalism, media and political advertisments are more about getting a perception of the truth accepted by a broad audience, and filling air, text space, etc to generate income, and less about truth. Less about presenting objective truth … this is the nature of the commerce-generating beast.

Please note that the insidious twist to this arrow into the heart of the American psyche launched by this ad is diabolically clever. Whether or not this statement/image is an enduring truth, whether it is based upon studied reflection, thoughtfulness, carefully measured observation or not … we must consider that it comes from the most vulnerable of the vulnerable, a young adolescent girl in the midst of tremendous personal loss.

See, George.

See, George, the Great White Father, hug.

See, George comfort.


It is as if W. takes a ride in a time machine back to WWII and gathers Anne Frank in an embrace that comes from all of us.


The twist in the ad is that our relationship with our president is not logical. This relationship is woven in a strange mix of pride, patriotism, father-hunger, and faith in the systems and institutions that are a part of our heritage. With a some healthy mistrust and skepticism that arises from our strong individualistic stock. We also love our leader. We want to even when we don't understand choices and decisions he makes. This love, or a hunger to have it alive in our patriotic hearts, is as much a part of U.S. citizens as our bones, our sinews, and our hearts.

Of course, screw ideological complexities, dismiss accountability, override easily observable inconsistencies, and even overlook the unabashed failure to acknowledge flaws or mistakes. See how easy this image makes our choice.


See the man.

See the good man.

See the good man offer comfort.

Who understands healthcare, who is smart enough? Noone. Why fuss over social issues from groups outside our direct concern and involvement? You says spending is a bit out of control, creating incredible debt for future generations? So. You site the more than 100.000 dead Iraqi people, dead, dead, dead—the people the U.S. claims to be spreading sweet freedom and democracy in the name of Lady Liberty. So, thousands of American sons and daughters in fresh graves as well. Not to worry. Look at the ad. See George.

See the picture.

In George we can trust. See, we are all a bit scared, just like that little girl. And, George, it is overwhelming and hard in my life. The terrorists could be anywhere. Please put your arms around me. Make all the hard work of sorting things out go away. Hold me, Great White Father.

I remember in group therapy an adult who was badly abused, as a child was very scared one night. The fear probably came from a regular series of uninterrupted beatings. Regardless, this night, the child, so spoke the reflecting adult, turned to the source of the abuse, his mother, holding onto her skirt and legs to ward off the fear, the terror. Only years later did he know realize that he was seeking comfort from the very source of his horror.

I cannot look at the photo-op ad's from W. re-election campaign, and the adolescent girl in it, without seeing this person from my therapy group share; his eyes, torn and dull; his form, shaking. I am not blaming George W. for 9-11, but I have severe concerns about his reluctance to have his actions reviewed. For me, the image presented in the ad is certainly not representative of his four years in office.

I believe this ad won the election for W. I believe it struck into the desperate longing of a people who are confused and inundated from a constant media bombardment of ideological fracturing, division and hate-mongering, and alternatively postured truths from disparate sources. This ad gives the Ultimate Kodak Moment, an answer everyone would love to snuggle into, a reduced response to the very complex challenges that face us.


But this ad is not an encapsulating, defining moment; if we look at W.’s entire record, this sophisticated contrived presentation is chocolate-covered cyanide. We pop what looks like a sweet treat into our palpitating mouths. We let the sweet, syrupy goo initially propel us into realms of sheer euphoria.

Only when the initial, glorious satiation subsides do we wrap our teeth around the unavoidable core. A core which holds are death as a people: the bitter pill of being duped, the trusting country farmer who buys a new horse that quickly turns up lame. We are, however, thanks to the sophisticated machinations of the Republican advertisement creators, granted the tender dignity of dying with a smile on our faces.


At the core of this 1950s, Norman Rockwell-meets-Harriet’s Ozzie image of this ad is sheer, unadulterated reduction, deception and manipulation of a tragedy for political gain. We swallowed it, though it offers no more lasting nourishment than the mirage of a luscious oasis in the desert, because we are hungry, hungry, hungry.

The picture holds an image of what *we would love to be real.* Our longing is the secret entranceway carved out by the scalpel-like penetration of W’s media illusionists; it allows them to bypass cognition, factual realities, recorded past performances and failures, and hit us at the prime emotive component at the core of the human experience. Hold me, Father. Make the hurt better, Daddy.

When children are lost, confused, bewildered they will seek food from any cabinet, without looking to see if there is a skull-and-cross-bone marking on the box. The majority of my fellow Americans bought this ad. This ad, coupled with a Republican-created agreement reality about Kerry won the day. The Republican strategists reduced the 20-year career of a thoughtful, measured opponent with the courage to allow convictions to grow and change in time, into “a politically expedient flip-flopper with no core convictions,” decided this election.


I am sick to my stomach.

Why?

Because I see the craft behind the mind(s) who designed this ad.

Readers may ask, “Why and how do I see the picture of a comforting hug as harmful and dangerous?”

Let us consider. If a child, young man or adult was in grief, isolated or in dire need of having touch-hunger needs met, it is conceivable that, pushed to the limit, the touch-hungry person might even welcome a live rattlesnake into their boudoir, or bed. If this occurred, the person would have the comfort of close proximity to another life form. However, if the snake, true to its nature, decided to inflict a poisonous bite, the inviting host would have to relinquish some rather basic freedoms: like being able to inhale, exhale and having a pulse. Like W.’s hug it comes to one at first glance like a sweet, ocean breeze, the ultimate warm fuzzy—BUT the image and its subtle construction carries a hidden, terrible cost: we also get the parts of the man that are not shown in the image-ad. We must see clearly. We must set aside our terrible hunger. We must be wise and reflective in selecting our bedfellows.

Now remember, if you want to believe W. is loving, caring and compassionate, feel free. That is what our country is made from. But, for me, when I put the drama of the 2004 election in contrast with the great stories, the fictions that hold truths that tell us volumes about ourselves, the verities that define us, that sort order from chaos, the story that most comes to mind, for me, a die-in-the-wool Kansan, is the previously referred to Wizard of Oz.

What if when casting this great musical, the character of Dorothy’s dog, Toto, was omitted?

There may have been no homecoming. Dorothy’s crew might still be taking orders from a loud voice, a scary figure, and an intricately orchestrated impostor. Then, dire consequences: no clicking red slippers back home. Auntie Em out of the picture forever.

Looking carefully, cutting through nonsense, is the job of media, Toto noticing the curtain swaying. Media is not about choosing sides and presenting what sells. We need Toto, the wise animal, the guide in so many fairy tells, the instinctual, the intuitive, the one who will not settle for partial or convenient truths. Without Toto we will never have the opportunity to find that at the core of the Great Wizard of Oz Theater is a frightened, wrinkled old man who hides behind skilled magicians who do nothing but make smoke and mirrors seem real. They create fantasy banquets. We go to gloriously filled tables. We devour the seeming delights before us. We walk away with a much greater hunger than with which we arrived. This is an ancient story, repackaged for our times; and we bought it.

We bought it because we want to believe in America. We want to stand tall at ballgames; we want to grieve our fallen warriors and not have to face the fact that they may have died without due cause. We want to have our voices ring when we reach for the high notes of the National Anthem. We want our tiny children, with serious, sacred faces, to sound a pure, honoring tone each morning at class. We want the words from the Pledge to blaze with meaning and truth. We want this Pledge to have teeth, and not be reduced to a monotone routine, deplete of meaning. We don’t want the sweet words to die harsh in the mouths of our children. We want to believe in our country, AND, our leader’s greatness.

There is coming a great day. When American shall rise from the ashes of its lost path, its shattered dreams. We shall arise, like Jesus in the Temple, with truth and the power to destroy in a cleansing hand. We will rise and tell every division-creating pundit—from both extremes—and we will teach them that truth has two faces, that truth has graciousness and space, that tearing, ripping, exposing every conceivable flaw in our leaders and systems, is dissection and death dealing, not honorable inquiry.

Sure, folks are drawn to the dirty. We love novels of serial killers; we have a heightened level of intrigue for the macabre, the horrific. We read Stephen King to see the shadow-self we seldom honor in the light. The tiny child in us who, when no adult was around, pulled the wings off of butterflies, never truly dies.

But we are more than our fascination with the dark.

I believe, together, we will choose a world where journalists-entertainers who play for robotic followers, fame and bags of dirty coins will be forced to stop pulling down the pants of the Emperor With No Clothes. If we did, indeed, on the impetus of one incredibly, artfully designed ad, elect W. for four more years, let us not despair. Still there is hope.

Lao Tse’s Tao Te Ching says, “When the country is confused and in chaos, loyal ministers appear.”

See.

Let us wait and see.

See George tear it down.

Tear it down.

Tear it down.

Tear it down.

See George tear us all down.

See—loyal ministers appear.

Dale A. Beaulieu (c)

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/4/2004 9:05 PM
ID# 78859
This is a reply to: 78856
I think that about sums him up.

In response specifically to your statement of Bush saying without saying that Kerry wouldn't keep us safe, I just have to add that I noticed many republicans were suffering from misunderstanding due to ads like what you're talking about.

It's one of those " we see what we want to see." things, as opposed to people trying to understand both sides.

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/4/2004 9:58 PM
ID# 78861
This is a reply to: 78859
Dave,

Hi.

Yes, seeing multiple aspects is healthy.

But, as I recall one can only vote one side (for any one candidate)

lol

Cheers (with BBQ sauce on top)

RC (also known as Cowboy Roy)

:)

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/4/2004 11:21 PM
ID# 78867
This is a reply to: 78856
Way to go, Beau!
Brrilliant!
And I am not even American.
But the eyes of the world have been upon your country this last few days, we watch with trepidation, because well.....
we know that the games played in your backyard, end up in ours, and I don't just mean the ball tossed over the fence.
Where are we all headed??
We aussies are still picking up the rubbish that came over the fence.......
Thanks for your insight Beau, as always, you echoed the thoughts of many.
Sunshiine

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/4/2004 11:44 PM
ID# 78869
This is a reply to: 78861
Well, yes. But it's a matter of understanding what one is voting for. Or in some cases what one is voting against.

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 9:24 AM
ID# 78873
This is a reply to: 78869
Dave,

Hi.

Well, over the years I have noticed that I do not agree 100% with one Party and at the same time disagree 100% with the other Party. Party here also includes the candidates and their 'spin'.

lol

Cheers (with beef and pork BBQ on the side)

CR

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 12:23 PM
ID# 78881
This is a reply to: 78873
I'm the same way.

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 1:36 PM
ID# 78886
This is a reply to: 78881
Dave,

Hi.

Not vegetarian or vegan?

:)

Cheers (north carolina bbq on the side)

RC

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 2:02 PM
ID# 78889
This is a reply to: 78856
Hi Dale!

Thanks for seeing the forest through the trees. There is more to it than meets the eye. There is a bigger plan, and George is a mere puppet.

It is just a matter of time before we are one global government, and the ad campaign will be the same.

Love,
Kimberlee

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 2:43 PM
ID# 78893
This is a reply to: 78886
RC,

/*\ Namaste :-}}

- glad to see you back at The Cafe.

- NC bbq is one of my favorite comfort foods.

>:-}}...

Reiki All Around,

All Blessings,

Firekeeper

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 2:51 PM
ID# 78894
This is a reply to: 78886
I meant the same way about not liking or disliking everything about a candidate.

I'm vegetarian going on 1month and one week. LOL

I do miss BBQ though. Especially from one particular place in NC. HAven't tried it here in TX so now obviously will miss out on the experience. Ehehehe

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 2:53 PM
ID# 78895
This is a reply to: 78893
Is there something special about NC BBQ?

I guess I wouldn't know since it's the only kind we ate in NC. LOL

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 3:16 PM
ID# 78898
This is a reply to: 78895
Dave,

/*\ Namaste :-}}

- well, all I ever knew was the red-sauce stuff until I moved to the South - and - visitied NC for the first time maybe 10 years ago. Stopped for BBQ at this place somewhere near Nags Head (while on vacation) and they offered two kinds - one red, one not red - so I tried the not-red and it was heaven.

>:-}}

- can't get it here anymore (the one BBQ place in town that served it sold out about four years ago)

>:-{{

Reiki All Around,

All Blessings,

Firekeeper

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 4:12 PM
ID# 78903
This is a reply to: 78898
Okay i know the kind you're talking about then. I didn't realize it was known as "NC" BBQ.

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 5:41 PM
ID# 78909
This is a reply to: 78894
Otharo!

Dave, Having grown up in Texas I have eaten much of it. My brother makes it different from most. He digs a trench big enough to hold whatever meat he has to use. Builds a fire with mosquite (which is our native wood), when there are lots of coals, he puts in the meat, covers it then covers all that with earth and leaves it until it is done. I have not observed him doing this as he is much younger than me and I was away from home when he came into his own. This is mosquite BBQ.

I attended a big BBQ when I was 12, at Sweetwater Lake. It was the celebration of the finishing of the big dam that created the lake. We kids spent our time sliding down the dam on our bottoms. (My father came and told me I was too old at 12 to do this) Everyone else did, though. I had five sibs and there were a lot of kids in our neighborhood camp. Meanwhile the adults were tending to the BBQ. They probably used a whole calf, at least a half calf. I saw it roasting over a big firepit provided at the camp. They also used our wood (being mosquite). They brushed something on it continually while it was roasting. It was late afternoon and evening by the time it was ready and we ate on it for hours. I do not remember any sauce. It was just tender, delicious meat.

In the 70's Coll's bunch always cooked half a calf like this, in Iowa, as well, as Texas. There was a pit built up of concrete blocks a metal grid to cover it, and a mechanism for turning it. Women cooked other things, the men took care of the fire and the meat. Here, there was garlic imbedded into the meat, and a sauce continually basted on the top side, then after turned, the other side. I think the sauce was just oil and vingar with garlic and onions. Sometimes the meat would have marinated overnight before hand.

finality

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 9:03 PM
ID# 78917
This is a reply to: 78894
Dear Conflagration,

My first reiki teacher was from NC. Did you learn reiki there in NC?

peace,

prosperity

re: Chocolate-covered Cyanide

posted at 11/5/2004 10:03 PM
ID# 78923
This is a reply to: 78917
Yes I recieved Reiki 1 and 2 from a woman in Chapel Hill.
Reiki 3 (the only distance one) was a woman who had formerly lived in either Raleigh or Cary, but at the time I contacted her she was in the process of moving to Apex (which is why it ended up being distance but it was free of charge).